I believe that any individual who is receiving a government subsidy should lose his/her right to vote for as long as s/he receives that subsidy.
This right would be reinstated as soon as the government subsidies ceased; however, no vote could be cast as long government “aid” was received. By “aid” I mean any form of payment from the government, whether it be cash or voucher, food stamps, housing allowance, aid to dependent children or farm subsidies. Any payment or reduced expense funded by the government should cause its recipient to lose his/her right to vote.
Wow, someone who is running for a public office wants to take rights away. That is astonishing!!
7 comments:
Yep, taking away rights. Just like that Obama fellow.
What about corporate welfare? Would all employees of the corporations receiving the money be ineligible, or just those at the top?
I had the same thought as Theron, about corporate welfare. The idea of taking voting rights away from those who receive public aid is truly appalling.
And what about everyone receiving Medicare and Social Security? Does she want to disenfranchise everyone over the age of 65?
and what about other government benefits, such as receiving aid from the police, fire dept, public schooling, use of roads... these are all aid from the government with quantifiable value. so basically, no one should be allowed to vote except perhaps isolated hermits in underground bunkers.
Its really intresting ,, information
thanks for this great link
___________________
victor
Save OVER 50% for 3 months,Save $21/mo for an Entire Year!* on your Favorite Channels
Just like that Obama fellow...
Thanky Nice Post
Good Blog :D
Post a Comment